Clinics in Dermatology
Volume 28, Issue 5 , Pages 539-545, September 2010

Management of syphilis in the HIV-infected patient: Facts and controversies

  • David Farhi, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Pavillon Tarnier, Hôpital Cochin, APHP, Université Paris V, 89 rue d'Assas, 75006 Paris, France
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Cabinet de dermatologie médicale et chirurgicale, 7 rue Coypel, 75013 Paris, France. Tel.: +33 1 42 17 07 37; fax: +33 1 58 41 28 95.
  • ,
  • Nicolas Dupin, MD

      Affiliations

    • Laboratoire de Recherche en Dermatologie. UPRES1833, Centre National de Reference de la Syphilis, Hôpital Cochin—Pavillon Gustave Roussy Université Paris V—Faculté de médecine, 89 rue d'Assas, 75006 Paris, France

Abstract 

After reaching an all time low at the turn of the millennium in several industrialized countries, the syphilis incidence is rising again, perhaps as a consequence of unsafe sexual behavior in response to improved antiretroviral therapeutic options for HIV. Since the beginning of the HIV pandemic, numerous reports on the various aspects of the interaction between syphilis and HIV have been published. Controversies persist on many issues of the management of coinfected patients. This contribution presents a critical appraisal of the available literature. Few large-scale, properly designed, controlled studies have compared syphilis baseline presentation and treatment response according to HIV status. Among the weakness are (1) high rates of patients lost to follow-up, (2) lack of long-term follow-up, (3) lack of gold standard criteria for treatment response, (4) small sample size, and (5) lack of stratification according to syphilis stage, ongoing antiretroviral treatment, CD4 cell count and HIV viral load. From the available data, and given the ever-possible publication bias, we conclude that if HIV has an effect on the course of syphilis, it is small and clinically manageable in most cases. The controversial issues discussed should furnish the rational for clinical research during the forthcoming decade.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0738-081X(10)00036-2

doi:10.1016/j.clindermatol.2010.03.012

Clinics in Dermatology
Volume 28, Issue 5 , Pages 539-545, September 2010