Clinics in Dermatology
Volume 28, Issue 5 , Pages 502-504, September 2010

Demodex mites: Facts and controversies

  • Dirk M. Elston, MD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationTel.: +1 570 271 8050; fax: +1 570 271 5940.

Department of Dermatology, Geisinger Medical Center, 100 N Academy Ave, Danville, Danville, PA 17822-5206, USA

Abstract 

Because Demodex mites are ubiquitous, their potential as human pathogens has often been ignored. This contribution focuses on the growing body of evidence linking Demodex mites with various skin disorders. Histologically, spongiosis and lymphoid inflammation are regularly seen in follicles containing Demodex mites. In animals, they are well established as a cause of mange, and a human counterpart–demodectic alopecia–appears to exist. There is also a statistical association between Demodex mite density and rosacea, facial itching, and chronic blepharitis. Papulovesicular rosacealike lesions and spiny blepharitis often respond to agents that reduce Demodex numbers. Although these observations are not sufficient to fulfill Koch's postulates, Koch's postulates are also not fulfilled for the association between brown recluse spiders and dermal necrosis or the association between streptococci and guttate psoriasis. The evidence linking Demodex mites to human disease has implications regarding treatment.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0738-081X(10)00030-1

doi:10.1016/j.clindermatol.2010.03.006

Clinics in Dermatology
Volume 28, Issue 5 , Pages 502-504, September 2010