Clinics in Dermatology
Volume 28, Issue 1 , Pages 52-56, January 2010

Malignancy concerns of topical calcineurin inhibitors for atopic dermatitis: facts and controversies

Department of Dermatology, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, D 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany

Abstract 

Topical calcineurin inhibitors have developed a bad connotation because of a black-box warning that was based on safety concerns of hypothetic systemic absorption and because systemic treatment with calcineurin inhibitors in patients who receive organ transplants is associated with an increased cancer risk. A few case reports of lymphoma and skin cancer in patients treated with topical calcineurin inhibitors initiated the discussion. These drugs were recommended for use as second-line therapy for the short-term and noncontinuous treatment of atopic dermatitis in patients who do not respond adequately to topical corticosteroids or in whom they are contraindicated. According to the latest knowledge, there is no scientific evidence of an increased risk for malignancy due to a topical treatment with calcineurin inhibitors.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0738-081X(09)00087-X

doi:10.1016/j.clindermatol.2009.04.001

Clinics in Dermatology
Volume 28, Issue 1 , Pages 52-56, January 2010