Clinics in Dermatology
Volume 28, Issue 1 , Pages 67-72, January 2010

Scoring and monitoring the severity of psoriasis. What is the preferred method? What is the ideal method? Is PASI passé? facts and controversies

  • Luigi Naldi, MD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationTel.: +39 0352278719; fax: +39 0352278676.
    web address

Centro Studi Gruppo Italiano Studi Epidemiologici in Dermatologia and Department of Dermatology, Ospedali Riuniti, Largo Barozzi 1, 24100 Bergamo, Italy

Abstract 

Instruments to measure and to monitor the severity of psoriasis over time are needed for research and for optimal patient care. Scoring psoriasis has moved from an earlier time when clinical categories were adopted without concern about their reliability; for example, from clearance to more recent semi-quantitative scores, such as the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), that carry the allure of being objective and quantitative “hard” data but actually translate a subjective judgement into a number. The PASI score has never been standardized, and data on interrater and intrarater reliability are limited. Better clinimetrics of disease severity are needed. The next generation of instruments should reflect the major concern of patients and treating physicians relative to safe and effective long-term disease control for a lifelong condition.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0738-081X(09)00047-9

doi:10.1016/j.clindermatol.2009.03.001

Clinics in Dermatology
Volume 28, Issue 1 , Pages 67-72, January 2010