Clinics in Dermatology
Volume 27, Issue 4 , Pages 350-354, July 2009

Sentinel lymph node biopsy and completion lymph node dissection for malignant melanoma are not standard of care

  • Brett M. Coldiron, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Dermatology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 3024 Burnet Avenue, Cincinnati, OH 45219, USA
  • ,
  • Scott Dinehart, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Dermatology, University of Arkansas School of Medicine, 6901 Lile Drive, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA
  • ,
  • Howard W. Rogers, MD

      Affiliations

    • Advanced Dermatology, LLC, 111 Salem Turnpike, Suite 7 Norwich, CT 06360, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.

Abstract 

Malignant melanoma is a cutaneous malignancy characterized by high metastatic potential and an unpredictable course. Enormous amounts of research have been done into surgical and adjunctive therapies for melanoma. Given the regularity with which sentinel lymph node biopsy and completion lymph node dissection are performed at private and academic hospitals, it would seem that evidence supporting these procedures is not controversial. A growing body of studies, however, points to sentinel lymph node biopsy and completion lymph node dissection as ineffective treatment for malignant melanoma and necessitates a discussion of what constitutes standard of care.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0738-081X(09)00026-1

doi:10.1016/j.clindermatol.2009.02.006

Clinics in Dermatology
Volume 27, Issue 4 , Pages 350-354, July 2009