Clinics in Dermatology
Volume 27, Issue 4 , Pages 346-349, July 2009

No more pens: what the 2009 Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturer's Association code changes really mean

  • Jeffrey J. Meffert, MD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: Tel.: +1 210 826 3258; fax: +1 210 348 8428.

Department of Dermatology, University of Texas Health Science Center–San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, 105 Cas Hills, San Antonio, TX 78213, USA

Abstract 

In 2002, new guidelines for interactions with the pharmaceutical industry and physicians were published as an official code of conduct. Adherence to the guidelines was voluntary, and there were no provisions for discipline to companies who did not subscribe to the code or who subscribed but did not comply. Many of the code standards are routinely violated, sometimes egregiously, with many violations on easy display at national professional meetings. In response to further problems and complaints, tougher code standards—now famous for the specific ban on logo pens and coffee cups—were adopted in 2009. Subscription to the new code is voluntary, and there are no provisions for discipline or punishment for those companies who chose not to subscribe or who may violate its standards.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0738-081X(09)00025-X

doi:10.1016/j.clindermatol.2009.02.005

Clinics in Dermatology
Volume 27, Issue 4 , Pages 346-349, July 2009