« Previous
Next »
Clinics in Dermatology
Volume 27, Issue 4
, Pages 339-345
, July 2009
The ethics of consulting with pharmaceutical companies
References
- . The discovery of aspirin: a reappraisal. BMJ. 2000;321:1591–1594
- . A national survey of physician-industry relationships. New Engl J Med. 2007;356:1742–1750
- . Doctors and drug companies–scrutinizing influential relationships. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:1796–1797
- . Pharmaceutical company payments to physicians. JAMA. 2007;297:1216–1223
- . The drug industry and medical professionalism. Lancet. 2006;367:28
- . Medical professionalism–focusing on the real issues. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1284–1286
- . How pharmaceutical industry funding affects trial outcomes: causal structures and responses. Soc Sci Med. 2008;66:1909–1914
- Health industry practices that create conflicts of interest. JAMA. 2006;295:429–433
- . A complicated web. Dermatol Times. 2008;32–35
- . CEJA Report G–I-90: gifts to physicians from industry. JAMA. 1991;265:501
- . Time to nip ‘seeding trials’ in the bud. Arch Dermatol. 2008;144:403–404
- . Administrative regulation: code of medical ethics for dermatologists section III-C. 2005;
- . Artificial-joint makers settle kickback case. NY: Times; 2007;
- . Dealing with innovation and costs in orthopedics: a conversation with Dane Miller. Health Affairs. 2006;25:w241–w251
- . Guest authorship and ghostwriting in publications related to rofecoxib. JAMA. 2008;299:1800–1812
- . Reporting mortality findings in trials of rofecoxib for Alzheimer disease or cognitive impairment. JAMA. 2008;299:1813–1817
- . Impugning the integrity of medical science. JAMA. 2008;299:1833–1835
- . Taking ethics seriously in cosmetic dermatology. Arch Dermatol. 2006;142:1641–1642
- . Professionalism and medical ethics in dermatology–2000. Arch Dermatol. 2000;136:101–102
- . Does declaration of competing interests affect readers' perceptions? A randomised trial. BMJ. 2002;325:1391–1392
- . Citing ethics, some doctors are rejecting industry pay. NY: Times; 2008;
- . Code of Medical Ethics Principle V. 2001;
- . NEJM admits to breaking its own tough rules. Science. 2000;287:1573
PII: S0738-081X(09)00024-8
doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2009.02.004
© 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Clinics in Dermatology
Volume 27, Issue 4
, Pages 339-345
, July 2009
